Jumat, 04 Januari 2013

NUZUL QURAN : Mengapa Al-Quran Berbahasa Arab ?


NUZUL QURAN :
Mengapa Al-Quran Berbahasa Arab?


Photo Surah Al-'Alaq ... dalam Al-Quran ...

Inilah ayat pertama yang diturunkan kemudian berperingkat-peringkat sehinggalah terkumpulnya 6,666 ayat dalam Al Quran.

Kira-kira 1398 tahun yang lepas, turunnya wahyu pertama kepada Nabi Muhammad S.A.W. pada tanggal 6 Ogos, 610. Ianya bersamaan dengan 17 Ramadhan, tahun ke-41 keputeraaan Baginda Nabi Muhammad SAW. Al Quran diturunkan pada malam jumaat di Gua Hira..

Dalam sejarah kehidupan Nabi SAW ayat al-Quran yang mula-mula diturunkan Allah kepada Nabi Muhammad SAW melalui perantaraan malaikat Jibrail ialah lima ayat pertama daripada surah Al-‘Alaq. maksudnya:

”Bacalah (wahai Muhammad) dengan nama Tuhan mu yang menciptakan (sekalian makhluk), Ia menciptakan manusia dari sebuku darah beku; Bacalah, dan Tuhan mu Yang Maha Pemurah, -Yang mengajar manusia melalui pena dan tulisan, -Ia mengajarkan manusia apa yang tidak diketahuinya.” (al-‘alaq:1-5)

Penurunan al-Quran ... didahului dengan suatu kalimah ‘iqra’’ bermaksud ‘baca’ . Di mana membaca adalah kunci kepada penerokaan ilmu.... dan Al-Quran merupakan satu panduan lengkap pada umat Islam sejagat..... dunia dan akhirat.

Namun umat Islam masih tercari cari haluan sendiri, walau jelas Al Quran itu adalah sebaik panduan untuk dunia dan akhirat oleh Nabi Muhammad saw kepada umatnya.

Al Quran tetap utuh sehingga kini, salah satu sebabnya adalah kerana ianya di turunkan dalam bahasa Arab.

“ Setiap saat, lahir orang-orang alim yang mampu menghapal isi kandungan Kitab Suci Al-Quran. Hatta, orang buta atau anak kecil. Itulah bedanya dengan Kitab Suci lain [Lanjutan Universalitas Al-Qur’an bagian 2- habis]“ Oleh: Qosim Nursheha Dzulhadi *)

“Mengapa Al-Quran diturunkan kepada seorang Nabi yang miskin dan buta huruf (ummiy)?

Mengapa tidak diberikan kepada pembesar Mekkah maupun Tha’if saja?”

Pertanyaan seperti ini sering terjadi.

Sama hal nya dengan pernyataan, “Mengapa Al-Qur’an berbahasa Arab?”

Banyak dalil yang mengungkap hal ini. Diantaranya; QS. 12: 2, 14: 4, 13: 37, 16: 103, 19: 97, 20: 113, 26: 193-195, 26: 198-199, 39: 28, 41: 3, 41: 44, 43: 3, 44: 58, dan 46 : 12.

Boleh dikata, hampir semua ayat tersebut menyatakan, bahwa Al-Qur’an itu diturunkan dalam “bahasa Arab”. Adalah keliru jika karena Allah menurunkan Al-Quran ke dalam bahasa Arab kemudian dikatakan “tidak universal”.

Kenapa Allah memilih bahasa Arab? Bukan bahasa lain?
Barangkali itu adalah hak Allah. Meski demikian, pilihan Allah mengapa Al-Quran itu dalam bahasa Arab bisa dijelaskan secara ilmiah.

Pertama, sampai hari ini, bahasa yang berasal dari rumpun Semit yang masih bertahan sempurna adalah bahasa Arab. Bahkan Bible (Old Testament) yang diklaim bahasa aslinya bahasa Ibrani (Hebrew) telah musnah, sehingga tidak ada naskah asli dari Perjanjian Lama.
Meskipun begitu, menurut Isrâ’il Wilfinson, dalam bukunya Târîk al-Lughât al-Sâmiyyah (History of Semitic Language), seperti yang dikutip Prof. Al-A‘zamî, ternyata bahasa asli PL itu tidak disebut Ibrani.

Bahasa pra-pengasingan (pre-exilic language) yang digunakan oleh Yahudi adalah dialek Kanaan dan tidak dikenal sebagai Ibrani. Orang-orang Funisia (atau lebih tepatnya, orang-orang Kanaan) menemukan alfabet yang benar pertama kali ± 1500 S.M, berdasarkan huruf-huruf ketimbang gambar-gambar deskriptif.

Semua alfabet yang berturut-turut seterusnya adalah utang budi pada, dan berasal dari, pencapaian Kanaan ini. (Prof. Dr. M.M. Al-A‘zamî, The History of The Qur’ânic Text from Revelation to Compilation (edisi Indonesia), terjemah: Sohirin Solihin, dkk., GIP, 2005, hlm. 259).

New Testament (Gospel, Injil) yang diklaim bahasa aslinya adalah bahasa “Yunani” juga sudah hilang, sehingga tidak ada naskah asli dari Injil. Bahkan, ini bertentangan dengan bahasa Yesus, yang sama sekali tidak paham bahasa Yunani. Bukankah ini ‘mencederai’ saktralitas Injil yang diklaim sebagai ‘firman Tuhan’?

Kedua, bahasa Arab dikenal memiliki banyak kelebihan: (1) Sejak zaman dahulu kala hingga sekarang bahasa Arab itu merupakan bahasa yang hidup, (2) Bahasa Arab adalah bahasa yang lengkap dan luas untuk menjelaskan tentang ketuhanan dan keakhiratan, (3) Bentuk-bentuk kata dalam bahasa Arab mempunyai tasrif (konjungsi), yang amat luas hingga dapat mencapai 3000 bentuk perubahan, yang demikian itu tak terdapat dalam bahasa lain. (Lihat, Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahnya, Depag, edisi revisi, Juli 1989, hlm. 375 (foot-note).

Ketiga, Allah menurunkan Al-Qur’an kepada Rasulullah SAW. dalam bahasa Arab yang nyata (bilisanin ‘Arabiyyin mubinin), agar menjadi: mukjizat yang kekal dan menjadi hidayah (sumber petunjuk) bagi seluruh manusia di setiap waktu (zaman) dan tempat (makan); untuk mengeluarkan manusia dari kegelapan kepada cahaya: dari kegelapan “syirik” kepada cahaya “tauhid”, dari kegelapan “kebodohan” kepada cahaya “pengetahuan”, dan dari kegelapan “kesesatan” kepada cahaya “hidayah”.
Tiga poin itu berjalan terus atas izin Allah sampai dunia ini hancur, yakni Risalah (Islam), Rasul (Muhammad SAW) dan Kitab (Al-Qur’an)). (Lihat, Prof. Dr. Thaha Musthafa Abu Karisyah, Dawr al-Azhar wa Jami‘atihi fi Khidmat al-Lughah al-‘Arabiyyah wa al-Turats al-Islamiy, dalam buku Nadwat al-Lughah al-‘Arabiyyah, bayna al-Waqi‘ wa al-Ma’mul, 2001, hlm. 42).

Karena Islam itu satu risalah (misi) yang “universal” dan “kekal”, maka mukjizatnya harus retoris (bayaniyyah), linguistik (lisaniyyah) yang kekal. Dan Allah telah berjanji untuk memelihara Al-Qur’an, seperti yang Ia jelaskan, “Sesungguhnya Kami yang menurunkan al-Dzikra (Al-Qur’an) dan Kami pula yang memeliharanya.” (Qs. 15: 9).

Keempat, menurut Syeikhu’l-Islam, Ibnu Taimiyah, “Taurat diturunkan dalam bahasa Ibrani saja. Dan Musa ‘alayhissalam tidak berbicara kecuali dengan bahasa itu. Begitu juga halnya dengan al-Masih: tidak berbicara tentang Taurat dan Injil serta perkara lain kecuali dengan bahasa Ibrani. Begitu juga dengan seluruh kitab. Ia tidak diturunkan kecuali dengan “satu bahasa” (bilisanin wahidin): dengan bahasa yang dengannya diturunkan kitab-kitab tersebut dan bahasa kaumnya yang diseru oleh para rasul.

Seluruh para Nabi, menyeru manusia lewat bahasa kaumnya yang mereka ketahui. Setelah itu, kitab-kitab dan perkataan para Nabi itu disampaikan: apakah diterjemahkan untuk mereka yang tidak tahu bahasa kitab tersebut, atau orang-orang belajar bahasa kitab tersebut sehingga mereka mengerti makna-maknanya. Atau, seorang utusan menjelaskan makna-makna apa yang dengannya ia diutus oleh Rasul dengan bahasanya…” (Lihat, Ibnu Taimiyah, al-Jawb al-Shahih liman Baddala Dina’l-Masih (Jawaban Yang Benar, Bagi Perubah Agama Kristus), (Cairo: Dar Ibnu al-Haytsam, 2003, jilid 1 (2 jilid), hlm. 188-189).

Sebagaimana Taurat dan Injil, Al-Quran diturunkan dalam satu bahasa, bahasa kaumnya. Bedanya, kenabian yang ada sebelum Islam, hanya diperuntukkan pada kaum tertentu atau zaman tertentu (lokalitas) saja. Nuh misalnya, hanya diutus kepada kaumnya (QS. 7: 59); Hud kepada kaumnya (QS. 7: 65); Shaleh kepada kaumnya (QS. 7: 73); Luth kepada kaumnya (QS. 7: 80); Syu‘aib kepada kaumnya (QS. 7: 85); dan Musa kepada Fir‘aun dan para punggawanya (QS. 7: 103).

Dakwah Nabi SAW di “Ummu’l-Qura”, sebagaimana arti yang sudah dijelaskan panjang lebar, bukan hanya dalam pengertian Mekkah semata. Juga bukan hanya untuk orang Quraisy, tidak pula untuk Jazirah Arabia saja, tapi untuk seluruh alam. (Baca QS. 25: 1, 34: 28, 7: 158, dan 9: 33).

Jika kalangan Nasrani menganggap Al-Quran tidak universal, maka, seharusnya yang lebih tidak universal justru Bible.

Meski bahasa Arab adalah bahasa yang rumit, namun bukanlah hal susah bagi umat Islam menghapalkannya. Ini berbeda dengan kitab suci lain, sebagaimana Bible misalnya.

Keuniversalan Al-Quran lainnya, dibuktikan dengan bagaimana Allah menjaganya melalui orang-orang alim dan yang memiliki kelebihan dalam menghapalkannya (tahfiz). Meski terdiri dari ribuan ayat, dalam sejarah, selalu saja banyak orang mampu menghapalkannya secara cermat dan tepat. Hatta, ia orang buta atau anak kecil sekalipun. Al-Quran, mudah dihapal atau dilantunkan dengan gaya apapun. Diakui atau tidak, ini berbeda dengan Bible atau Injil.

Karena itu, setiap usaha apapun untuk menambah atau mengurangi Al-Quran baik yang dilakukan kalangan orientalis atau orang kafir dalam sepanjang sejarah selalu saja ketahuan.

Jangan heran bila banyak umat Islam tiba-tiba ribut gara-gara ada Al-Quran palsu atau sengaja dipalsukan sebagaimana terjadi dalam kasus “The True Furqon.” Barangkali itulah cara Allah menjaganya.

Dan hebatnya, para penghapal Al-Quran, setiap saat selalu saja lahir dan bisa ditemukan di seluruh dunia. Untuk yang seperti ini, di Indonesia, bahkan sudah mulai banyak dijadikan sebagai pesantren-pesantran formal.

Sebaliknya, bagi kita, belum pernah terdengar ada orang Kristen atau Yahudi yang hapal keseluruhan kitab suci mereka. Bahkan termasuk pendeta atau pastur sekalipun. Mengapa bisa demikian? Saya kira Anda lebih tahu jawabannya.

Wallahu a‘lamu bi al-shawab. []

sumber: http://fakta-illuminati.blogspot.com/
New York (CNN) -- The United Nations General Assembly on Thursday endorsed an upgraded U.N. status for the Palestinian Authority, despite intense opposition from the United States and Israel.
The resolution elevates their status from "non-member observer entity" to "non-member observer state," the same category as the Vatican, which Palestinians hope will provide new leverage in their dealings with Israel.
Its leaders had been working with dozens of supporting nations to develop a formal draft, enlisting the backing of European countries such as France and Spain.
The vote was 138 delegates in favor of the measure, nine against and 41 abstentions, including Germany.
U.N. approves Palestinian status upgrade
Palestinian status upgraded
Ramallah celebrates U.N. vote
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said the move, which many call symbolic, represents a "last chance to save the two-state solution."
It comes on the heels of an eight-day conflict that raged between Israel and Hamas fighters, where a series of airstrikes and rocket launches drew international attention and threatened regional stability.
"We did not come here seeking to delegitimize a state established years ago, and that is Israel; rather we came to affirm the legitimacy of the state that must now achieve its independence, and that is Palestine," he said.
But Israel's U.N. ambassador Ron Prosor said the move largely ignores the specifics of longstanding issues, such as settlements in disputed lands, and cannot substitute for direct negotiations between Jerusalem and Ramallah.
This resolution "doesn't pursue peace," Prosor said, criticizing Abbas for being unable to represent the Gaza Strip, where a Hamas-controlled government presides.
"It pushes it backwards," he said.
Izzat Al-Rashq, a member of the Hamas' political bureau, welcomed the decision but made demands reflecting Hamas' unwillingness to recognize the state of Israel.
"We need to put this in its normal context as a part of the National Strategic vision based upon the rights and national principles without compromising an ounce of soil from our Palestinian lands extending from the Ocean to the (Jordan) river," he posted to his Facebook page.
He called for the establishment of a Palestinian state "with Jerusalem being its capital" on land that includes what is Israel.
The effort stalled last year when it became apparent that the bid could not get the necessary support in the Security Council. Observer state status does not require Security Council approval, unlike full membership recognition.
The observer status resolution needs only a majority of the U.N.'s 193 members to approve.
Rice: U.N. vote an obstacle to peace
Palestinian envoy: We want to negotiate
Prosor: I heard a speech 'full of hate'
The United States and Israel have remained steadfast in their opposition, saying the move will not advance the cause of Middle East peace.
U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice said American leaders could not support a measure that circumvents direct talks and cautioned that Thursday's decision did "not establish Palestine as a state."
Rice urged both sides to the resume direct negotiations without preconditions.
"Israel is prepared to live in peace with a Palestinian state," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday. "But for peace to endure, Israel's security must be protected, the Palestinians must recognize the Jewish state and they must be prepared to end the conflict with Israel once and for all."
Israeli government spokesman Mark Regev called the resolution "political theater."
But Palestinian leaders have said they had the right to go to the U.N. because Israel failed to comply with agreements signed more than two decades ago.
"It's about a contract. Our contract is that in five years, we should have concluded the treaty of peace and all core issues. This did not happen, and we're talking about 20 years later. And going to the U.N. is not a unilateral step," Palestinian Authority chief negotiator Saeb Erakat said in September.
The last round of negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority was in 2010.
Erakat said the new status would eliminate Israeli justifications for building settlements in the disputed areas of East Jerusalem and the West Bank.
But Israeli officials disagreed.
"No decision by the U.N. can break the 4,000-year-old bond between the people of Israel and the land of Israel," Netanyahu said.
Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, however, threw his full support behind the new status for the Palestinian Authority.
"What the Palestinians moved to do today in the U.N., I think is in basic line with the strategy of a two-state solution," Olmert told CNN's Christiane Amanpour on Thursday.
The peace process is completely stalled at the moment, but Olmert said Israel must move rapidly toward a two-state solution. "Time is running out for Israel more than for the Palestinians," he said.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, who supports a two-state solution, said Thursday's vote "underscores the urgency of a resumption of meaningful negotiations."
"I urge the parties to renew their commitment to a negotiated peace," Ban said.
Meanwhile in Washington, Israel's Defense Minister Ehud Barak addressed his country's relations with Iran and expressed doubt about sanctions against that country. The United Nations' nuclear watchdog has said Iran is cooperating enough in a review of its nuclear programs.
"I don't believe that these kinds of sanctions will bring them to a moment of truth where they sit around a table and look at each others eyes and decide that the game is over, they can't stand it anymore, they are going to give up their nuclear intention," Barak said.
Barak was visiting U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who noted how the Israeli defense chief announced his retirement from political life. Panetta praised Barak's "brilliant strategic mind" and "warrior heart."

Source: http://edition.cnn.com/2012/11/29/world/meast/palestinian-united-nations/index.html

Israeli Documentary on 6 Former ShinBet Chiefs & the Genocidal, Neo Nazi, Zionist State of Israel !

http://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2011/05/26/ashkenazi-jews-are-not-descendents-of-the-biblical-israelites-2/
Revelation 2:9 – …. and I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.
“Shalom shocked viewers. He called Israeli occupation no different from Nazi occupied Europe.” – Quote
  • No more denials! Out of Zionist ’666′ Israel’s former ShinBet head: “Israeli occupation no different from Nazi occupied Europe!” No more falsely accusing me of anti-Semitism! Zionist ’666′ Israel is a Satanic counterfeit! It is NOT the Israel of the Bible! Modern non semitic Ashkenazi Khazar Jews (90+% of modern Jewry) are not the biological descendents of the 12 tribes of Israel! They are not the chosen people. Their ancestors were never the chosen people. They are from the region North of the Caucasus mountains and are of Turkish-Mongolian stock!  Emphasis mine:
    -
  • The Gatekeepers: Exposing Israel’s Dark Side!
    by Stephen Lendman, http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/
    Dror Moreh is one of Israel’s leading cinematographers. Last October, his documentary featuring candid dialogues with former Shin Bet heads debuted in New York.
    -
     In early 2013, other Western venues will show it. Over the weekend, it premiered at Tel Aviv’s Cinematheque. Segmented titles include Forget Morality, Collateral Damage, and One Man’s Enemy is Another Man’s Freedom Fighter.
     -
    Interviews with six former Shin Bet heads were shown. They attended the Israeli premier. Joseph Cedar’s drama Footnote was included. More on film content below.
    …..
    On November 25, New York Times film critic AO Scott headlined “Six Israeli Spymasters on a Shadowy Past and a Dark Future,” saying:
    -
    They’re retired. They reflected “about past triumphs and frustrations.” Avraham Shalom, Yaakov Peri, Carmi Gillon, Ami Avalon, Avi Dichter, and Yuval Diskin were interviewed.
     -
    They approved the film. Their views reflected former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s warning that Israel faced national suicide if decades of occupation didn’t end.
     …
    Perhaps fears of Israel’s demise motivated them to speak. Doing so may help save the country, they likely feel. Gillon said “We are making the lives of millions miserable.” Outspoken Israeli intellectual Yeshayahu Leibowitz (1903 – 1994) warned that governing occupied “foreigners” would transform Israel into “a Shin Bet state.”
     -
    Zionists can’t admit that indigenous Palestinians lived in today’s Israel for centuries. Calling them “foreigners” demeans their longstanding ties to land rightfully theirs. Israel stole it. Who in a current or past position of power dares say so?
     -
    Shin Bet heads are assassins. The six men interviewed have decades of blood on their hands. Reflection perhaps seeks redemption. It’s much too late to matter. Atonement isn’t in Israel’s vocabulary. It’s hard imagining they’re comments will influence current policy. It’s worse now than ever.
     -
    Moreh’s film is “amazing (and) upsetting,” said Scott. It covers ground rarely seen on film or discussed publicly. It challenges “conventional wisdom on all sides of the conflict.” Candid interviews revealed “devastating assessments of the failings of successive (Israeli) governments.”
     -
    Yaakov Peri ran Shin Bet from 1988 – 1994. He was there during the first Intifada and Oslo. “I think after retiring from this job you become a bit of a leftist,” he said.
     -
    He and others interviewed aren’t doves. While critical of occupation harshness, they’re largely mindless about Palestinian suffering. Only Israel’s future matters. It prompted them to speak out.
     -
    Avraham Shalom headed Shin Bet from 1981 – 1986. He resigned after being accused of ordering two Palestinian prisoners killed and orchestrating a subsequent cover-up.
     -
    On the one hand, he defended Shin Bet tactics. On the other, he called Israel’s future “very dark.” He lamented about occupation harshness. It’s a legacy perhaps he’d like to forget. e’s not alone. Others interviewed expressed similar views. Scott called them “rare, (and) welcome (with) almost unbearable clarity.” He exaggerated to make a point.
     -
    Los Angeles Times film critic Kenneth Turan called Moreh’s documentary “more than simply eye-opening.” It’s “potent enough to alter how you see the world,” he said. Perhaps a little, but not enough.
     -
    Moreh did what seemed impossible. He convinced six former spymasters to discuss what’s kept secret. They ran Shin Bet from 1981 – 2011. They spoke publicly for the first time.
     -
    They revealed snippets of Israel’s dark history. They stopped well short of telling all. What’s most important was omitted. Why they said anything they’ll have to explain. They “demonstrate(d) how soul-destroying it can be (to) mandate behavior that may seem amoral or even immoral.”
     -
    They stopped well short of agonizing over what they did. Late in life conscience pangs ring hollow. Other priorities got them to say anything. At the same time, they support Palestinian self-determination. They expressed disdain for Israeli opposition.
     -
    They said Palestinian resistance is justified. Israeli leaders don’t address it. Confronting it violently reflects state terrorism. Israel should talk to Hamas. Shalom shocked viewers. He called Israeli occupation no different from Nazi occupied Europe. If current Israeli, American, or other Western politicians suggested this, they’d be run out of town next election.
     -
    On December 30 Haaretz contributor Gideon Levy discussed the film. Shin Bet leaders do dirty work, he said. It affords them “an aura of prestige and esteem.”
     -
    “Oh, how we applaud our spooks.” Two former Shin Bet heads became cabinet ministers. Another was successful in business. Murder, Inc. rewards its bosses. Doves have no place in Israeli society.
     -
    “This jolting film is a must-see,” said Levy. “A feeling of nausea and of deep disgust wells up at its end.” Occupation truths are told. Some but way short of all.
     -
    Responsible assassins explained. Mea culpas were omitted. They stopped well short of admitting responsibility for unspeakable crimes. They have lots more explaining to do. They admitted “being blinkered.” They didn’t examine the consequences of their actions.
     -
    Coming together on film “resembl(es) a mafia movie.” They speak like dons. Each did it his own way. They fell far short of entirely frank. They were “subcontractors” in Israel’s “war on terror.” They knew their job was lawless, immoral and inhumane. Shalom claimed “There is no morality.” Might alone makes right.
     -
    When it’s too late to matter, they spoke. They’re hardly profiles in courage. Where were they when policies they mandated could have made a difference? They prioritized assassinations, torture, and other forms of abuse. They helped institutionalize lawlessness. They made Israel a police state.
     -
    “Now they remember to say that the Palestinian problem cannot be solved with force.” It’s high time they stressed an Israeli problem. ”Rolling their eyes, they pass responsibility onto the political leadership.” They were part of its disreputable past. They could have acted responsibly.
     -
    They could have refused to commit crimes. They could have supported right over wrong. They chose other priorities. Unspeakable cruelty reflects them. They’ll carry them to their graves.
     -
    Palestinian rage followed “monstrous methods” they used. Then and now, they include beatings, torture, humiliation, other forms of abuse, and cold-blooded murder.
     -
    They admit crimes this grave. They remain unaccountable. They fall well short of remorse. They expressed no regrets. Why should they? They’re heroes. Israel “cheer(s) them on.”

Revelation 2:9 – …. and I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.
  • The 13th Tribe of Khazaria! Ashkenazi Khazars Are Not The Jews of The Bible!
    If almost 98% of JEWS we know today are NOT semitic, wouldn’t the term ANTI-SEMITIC be null and void? I made this video with 3 Jewish friends who admit they are not Semites!!!!
    -
    “Many [modern-day Jews] of whom have clamored to go back [to Palestine] NEVER had antecedents [physical ancestors] in that part of the world …. The OVERWHELMING majority of Jews are descendants from the converts of Khazaria and elsewhere who ADOPTED Judaism…. This VIEW of the NON-ethnicity of the largest portion of Jewry IS SUSTAINED by such prominent anthropologists as Ripley, Weissenberg, Hertz, Boas, Pittard, Fishberg, Mead and others. . “
    - Dr. Alfred M. Lilienthal
    -
    “… Though many Jews are NOT of Semitic origin, we are the religious, spiritual, and national [but NOT genetic] descendants of those who first formed the early foundations of Judaism who were Semites”
    - Rabbi Cyril A. Stanway in “Viewpoints,” Thursday, November 8, 1990, in the Sun-News (Las Cruces, New Mexico)
    -
    “. . these Eastern European, Yiddish-speaking Jews who form the Zionist group practically in toto [almost entirely], have NEITHER a geographic, historic NOR ethnic connection with either the Jews [Israelite Judahites] of the Old Testament OR the land known today as Palestine. “
    - Jewish Dr. Benjamin H. Freedman, published by the National Economic Council, Inc. as “Council Letter No. 177 (October 15, 1947)
    -
  • Modern Judaism is not the religion of the Bible! See here!
  • Modern Ashkenazi Jews are not the Jews of the Bible! God’s covenant was with Abraham and his biological descendents. Ashkenazi Jews are not semitic and their ancestors were never in Palestine. They are not the descendents of Abraham/Isaac/Israel. They have no right to stay in Palestine. What the Zionists are doing to the Palestinians is called: genocide and ethnic cleansing! Zionist ’666′ Israel is not the Israel of the Bible! It is a LIE!
    -
    1980 Jewish Almanac
    “Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.” (1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3)
    .
    The Jewish Encyclopedia:
    “Khazars, a non-Semitic, Asiatic, Mongolian tribal nation who emigrated into Eastern Europe about the first century, who were converted as an entire nation to Judaism in the seventh century by the expanding Russian nation which absorbed the entire Khazar population, and who account for the presence in Eastern Europe of the great numbers of Yiddish-speaking Jews in Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Galatia, Besserabia and Rumania.”
    .
    The American Peoples Encyclopedia … for 1954 at 15-292 records the following in reference to the Khazars: “In the year 740 A.D. the Khazars were officially converted to Judaism. A century later they were crushed by the incoming Slavic-speaking people and were scattered over central Europe where they were known as Jews.
    -
    According to the standard Jewish Encyclopedia 96% of all the Jews known to the world today are descendents of the Khazar tribes of Russia, Eastern Europe and western Mongolia.
    -
  • The Bible specifically forbids the ill-treatment of people different from us ie: strangers. What Zionist ’666′ Israel does to the Palestinians is called: genocide and ethnic cleansing! Zionist ’666′ Israel is in total violation of God’s law!
    -
    Exodus 22:21
    “You shall neither mistreat a stranger nor oppress him, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt.”
    Exodus 23:9
    “Also you shall not oppress a stranger, for you know the heart of a stranger, because you were strangers in the land of Egypt.”
    Leviticus 19:33
    ‘And if a stranger dwells with you in your land, you shall not mistreat him.’
    Leviticus 19:34
    The stranger who dwells among you shall be to you as one born among you, and you shall love him as yourself; for you were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.
    Leviticus 23:22
    ‘When you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not wholly reap the corners of your field when you reap, nor shall you gather any gleaning from your harvest. You shall leave them for the poor and for the stranger: I am the LORD your God.’
    Leviticus 24:22
    You shall have the same law for the stranger and for one from your own country; for I am the LORD your God.
    Ezekiel 47:22-23
    22
    It shall be that you will divide it by lot as an inheritance for yourselves, and for the strangers who dwell among you and who bear children among you. They shall be to you as native-born among the children of Israel; they shall have an inheritance with you among the tribes of Israel. 23 And it shall be that in whatever tribe the stranger dwells, there you shall give him his inheritance,” says the Lord GOD.
    -
  • The so-called Star of David is a Satanic symbol. Satanists and occult practitioners use it for calling Satan and demons!
    -
    Former Satanist, Bill Schnoebelen (now born again Christian)
    “A hexagram must be present to call forth a demon” and ” it is a very powerful tool to invoke Satan”. – “To the sorcerer, the hexagram is a powerful tool to invoke Satan.” In fact, the word “hex” — as to put a “hex” or “curse” on people — comes from this word. – If you examine the so-called “Star of David,” or hexagram, closely, you will discover something astonishing. It has six points, forms six equilateral triangles, and in its interior forms a six sided hexagon — thus it reveals the number of Satan’ antichrist beast, — 6 points, 6 triangles, and the 6 sides of the hexagram — 666 !!!
     
    *Sorry, this isn't to disguise Israel people* 
    Source: http://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/israeli-documentary-on-6-former-shinbet-chiefs-the-genocidal-neo-nazi-zionist-state-of-israel/

MUSLIM SCHOLARS SAY: "COINCIDENCE; OLD TALES!!"

THIS IS WHAT GOD  SAYS

The disbelievers would look at the Quran, then decide that it is not from God. They would say:
This is human-made. 74:25
The answer to the disbelievers' claim 5 the number "19"'
0n it is Nineteen. 74:30
All Quranic numbers are defined - forty nights, seven heavens, four months, etc. - except for the number "8" in 69:17 and the number "19" in 74:30. This indicates that "19" is purely mathematical. Specifically, Almighty God gives us a list of functions of the number "19" (74:31). This is what "19" will do:
[1] Disturb the disbelievers
[2] Establish certainty in the hearts of the believers, the Jews, and the Christians,  concerning the divine origin of the Quran.
[3] Strengthen the faith of the faithful.
[4] Remove all doubt from the hearts of the believers, and the Jews,  and the Christians.
[5] Expose the hypocrites and the disbelievers who say with their lips that they are believers; they will not accept the 19- based miracle. 74:31
After stating an awesome oath - "By he moon, by the night as passes, and the morning as it shines" - our  Creator tells us:
This is one of the great miracles. 74:35

THIS IS WHAT THE "SCHOLARS" SAY: "19" are the guardians of  Hell.

The question to the Muslim scolars who reject God's miracle is: "Why will the 19 guardians of Hell" disturb the disbelievers, establish certainty in the hearts of people, strengthen the faith of the faithful, remove all doubt from the people's hearts, and expose the hypocrites" as we see in 74:31 above?

A FEW SIMPLE FACTS

With the "19" of 74:25-35 in mind,  let us look at a few of the Miracle's Simple Facts (one-millionth of the Miracle).
[1] The first verse consists of 19 letters, [2] the number of suras is 114 (19x6), [3] the number of verses is 6346 (19x334), [4] the famous first revelation consist of 19 words and 76 (19x4) letters, [5] the last revelation (Sura 110) consists of 19 words, [6] the first revelation is placed atop the last 19 suras of the Quran, [7] the first revelation (Sura 96) consists of 19 verses and 304 letters (19x16), [8] we find 19 suras between the missing Basmalah (Sura 9) and the extra Basmalah (Sura 27), [9] the numbers mentioned in the Quran add up to a total of 162146, or 19x8534, and [10] if you write down every sura number followed by every verse number, you end up with a very long number consisting of 12692 digits -- both the number of digits and the very long number itself are multiples of 19.

THEY CAN'T SEE THE MIRACLE

The "learned Muslim scholars”  believe that these overwhelming "19's" are perfectly normal in any book!!!
Furthermore, to help them pretend that these miraculous phenomena do no exist, they deny their own respected sources. Despite the unanimous reports by their legendary  scholars (Razy, Qurtuby, etc.) that the Basmalah consists of 19 letters - a very simple and very obvious physical fact-the Muslim scholars declared their pitiful ignorance. They declared that they do not know how many letters there are in the Basmalah! !! They now say that the Basmalah consists of either 18, or 21, or 22 letters - they do not know. They know for sure that it is not 19!

WOULD YOU TRUST "SCHOLARS" WHO DO NOT EVEN KNOW THE FIRST VERSE OF QURAN?

The "learned Muslim Scholars" who met m Chicago October 7 & 8, including Shaykh AI-Azhar, Mecca's Imam, the head of the World Muslim League, and many top leaders from India and Pakistan, have admitted their ignorance regarding the number of letters in the first verse of the Quran. They disagree on whether it consists of 18,21, or 22 letters!! Can you trust them to teach you the other verses of the Quran? Can you?
Read 17:45-46 and 18:57.


Source: http://www.masjidtucson.org/publications/books/SP/1989/dec/page3.html
16 TENSES IN ENGLISH

1. Simple Present Tense
S + V1 + O
Ex : I write a letter
She writes a letter

2. Simple Past Tense
S + V2 + O
Ex : I wrote a letter
She wrote a letter

3. Present Future Tense
S + will or shall + V1 + O
Ex : She will write a letter

4. Past Future Tense
S + would + V1 + O
Ex : She would write a letter

5. Present Prefect Tense
S + have or has + V3 + O
Ex : I have written a letter
She has written a letter

6. Past Prefect Tense
S + had + V3 + O
Ex : She had written a letter

7. Present Continuous Tense
S + was or were + V-ing + O
Ex : She is writing a letter

8. Past Continuous Tense
S + will or shall + V1 + O
Ex : She will write a letter

9. Present Prefect Continuous Tense
S + have or has + been + V-ing + O
Ex : I has been writing a letter
She have been writing a letter

10. Past Prefect Continuous Tense
S + had + been + V-ing + O
Ex : I had been writing a letter

11. Present Future Continuous Tense
S + will + be + V-ing + O
Ex : She will be writing a letter

12. Past Future Continuous Tense
S + would + be + V-ing + O
Ex : She would be writing a letter

13. Present Future Prefect Tense
S + will + have + been + V3 + O
Ex : She will have been written a letter

14. Past Future Prefect Tense
S + would + have + been + V3 + O
Ex : She would have been written a letter

15. Present Future Prefect Continuous Tense
S + will + have + been + V-ing + O
Ex : She will have been writing a letter

16. Past Future Prefect Continuous Tense
S + would + have + been + V-ing + O
Ex : She would have been writing a letter

Ok guys… hope its help U up…

Sumber: http://ika-kireina09.blogspot.com/2011/03/16-tenses-in-english.html